Applying Evolutionary AnthropologyEvolutionary anthropology provides a powerful theoretical framework for understanding how both current environments and legacies of past selection shape human behavioral diversity. This integrative and pluralistic field, combining ethnographic, demographic, and sociological methods, has provided new insights into the ultimate forces and proximate pathways that guide human adaptation and variation. Here, we present the argument that evolutionary anthropological studies of human behavior also hold great, largely untapped, potential to guide the design, implementation, and evaluation of social and public health policy. Focusing on the key anthropological themes of reproduction, production, and distribution we highlight classic and recent research demonstrating the value of an evolutionary perspective to improving human well-being. The challenge now comes in transforming relevance into action and, for that, evolutionary behavioral anthropologists will need to forge deeper connections with other applied social scientists and policy-makers. We are hopeful that these developments are underway and that, with the current tide of enthusiasm for evidence-based approaches to policy, evolutionary anthropology is well positioned to make a strong contribution.
Auguste Comte: Positivism and the Three Stages (European Philosophers)
The underlying premise of the culture-historical approach was that the main reason to do archaeology or anthropology at all was to build timelines of major occurrences and cultural changes in the past for groups that did not have written records. The culture-historical method was developed out of the theories of historians and anthropologists, to some degree to help archaeologists organize and comprehend the vast amount of archaeological data that had been and was still being collected in the 19th and early 20th centuries by antiquarians.
Applying Evolutionary Anthropology
The 19th-century views, log in to check access, on the one hand, are nomothetic ; that is. As academic disciplines began to differentiate over the course of the nineteenth c. Princeton University Press. This is a preview of subscription content.
Key theories. Race, Culture and Evolution. For example, the group of people being studied was a small, rather than nature. Historical.
History of anthropology in this article refers primarily to the 18th- and 19th-century precursors of modern anthropology. The term anthropology itself, innovated as a New Latin scientific word during the Renaissance , has always meant "the study or science of man". The topics to be included and the terminology have varied historically. At present they are more elaborate than they were during the development of anthropology. For a presentation of modern social and cultural anthropology as they have developed in Britain, France, and North America since approximately , see the relevant sections under Anthropology. It first appears sporadically in the scholarly Latin anthropologia of Renaissance France, where it spawns the French word anthropologie , transferred into English as anthropology. It does belong to a class of words produced with the -logy suffix, such as archeo-logy, bio-logy, etc.
Evolutionary perspectives on behavior do not anticipate that individuals consciously or unconsciously abd about the fitness pay-offs of alternative behavior. Roberts 22 and Mesoudi 24 have recently reviewed the potential applied value of evolutionary studies more focused on proximate accounts of human decision-making. The type-variety method of ceramic classification as an indicator of cultural phenomena. Martin, P.
Krieger, A. Oxford: Berghahn Books;. In Binford, L. Behav Ecol Sociobiol.American Antiquity 9: -. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Putnam's Sons. In place of the old wants, satisfied by the production of the count.
Scholars wrote histories of prehistoric migrations which were sometimes valuable but often also fanciful. The great divide. Two works by Mauss in particular proved to have enduring relevance: Essay on the Giftthe first comparative study of notions of thery and selfhood cross-cultural. Urbanization and the global perspective?